What is the CMLTO Governance Scorecard?
The CMLTO Governance Scorecard is our Board of Directors’ way of measuring key governance and outcome indicators over the year. This way, the CMLTO Board of Directors can hold itself accountable for delivering on its vision, achieving the College’s critical results, and delivering governance excellence.
The CMLTO Governance Scorecard is divided into the following Key Indicators which are measured and reported on:
- Board Member Capacity
- Careholder Linkage Outcomes
- Critical Governance Process Outcomes
- Public Interest Impact
Within these 4 main Key Indicators, there are more sub-indicators included. Read below for more information on the sub-indicators, their description, CMLTO’s targets, and our current position:
Board Member Capacity
This area of focus relates to the Board’s ability to develop and maintain competencies required to meet its responsibilities.
Number of Board Members attending at least 75% of Board Orientation sessions at the February meeting / Total number of Board Members at the time of the meeting.
TARGET = 100%

Table showing a percentage measure of Board member capacity for 2026. February: 87.7 percent. April: 88.9 percent. May: 70.0 percent. September and December: not yet reported.
Number of Board Members who select “Agree” to a survey question regarding the utility of the orientation / Total number of Board Members who responded to the survey.
TARGET = 85%

Table showing a percentage measure of Board member capacity for 2026. February: 77.5 percent. April: 89.7 percent. May: 80.4 percent. September and December: not yet reported.
Cumulative count of education session hours focused on the Board being aware of their roles and responsibilities.
TARGET = 20 hours

Table showing reported Board member capacity in hours for 2026. February: 9.25 hours. April: 2.0 hours, with 11.25 hours cumulative. May: 2.25 hours, with 13.5 hours cumulative. September and December: not yet reported.
Number of Board Members who select “Agree” to a survey question regarding their preparation to engage in the Board meeting, based on the preparatory material provided to them in advance of the meeting.
TARGET = 5/5 rating

Table showing Board member capacity ratings out of 5 for 2026. February: 4.3 out of 5. April: 4.1 out of 5. May: 4.2 out of 5. September and December: not yet reported.
Number of Board Members who select “Always” to the “Board Discipline” questions regarding the effectiveness of whole Board discussion and debate / Total number of Board Members who completed the Board’s self-evaluation process.
TARGET = 100%

Table showing a percentage measure of Board member capacity for 2026. February: not applicable. April: not applicable. May: 100 percent. September: not applicable. December: not yet reported.
Careholder Linkage Outcomes
This area of focus relates to the Board’s ability to be attentive and responsive to the public’s needs.
Percent of planned Careholder linkages are completed, as reported to the Board at meetings, as required by the Careholder Engagement Plan.
TARGET = 100%
Table showing a percentage measure of Careholder Linkage for 2026. February: not applicable. April: 100 percent. May: not applicable. September: not yet reported. December: not yet reported.
Number of Board discussions and decisions made at each meeting where outcomes of current or prior linkage outcomes are applied. Table showing a percentage measure of Careholder Linkage for 2026. February: not applicable. April: 100 percent. May: not applicable. September: not yet reported. December: not yet reported. This area of focus relates to the Board’s ability to meet its governance process accountabilities. Number of Board motions where quorum was met / Number of Board motions per meeting. TARGET = 100% Table showing a percentage measure of Critical Process for 2026. February: 100 percent. April: 100 percent. May: 100 percent. September: not yet reported. December: not yet reported. Percent of Board motion votes by vote type (in favour / not in favour / abstain) Table showing responses to a Critical Process measure for 2026. February: In favour – 100 percent; Not in favour – 0 percent; Abstain – 0 percent. April: In favour – 100 percent; Not in favour – 0 percent; Abstain – 0 percent. May: In favour – 99.6 percent; Not in favour – 0.4 percent; Abstain – 0 percent. September and December: not yet reported. Number of Board Members who select “Agree” to a survey question regarding the effectiveness of the Board Chair in meeting their responsibilities at the Board meetings. TARGET = 5/5 Rating Table showing 2026 results by reporting period: February, 4.7 out of 5; April, 4.6 out of 5; May, 4.7 out of 5. September and December results have not yet been reported. Percent of Board motion votes by vote type (in favour / not in favour / abstain) TARGET = 100% Table showing reporting status by month: February 2026 — N/A; April 2026 — N/A; May 2026 — N/A; September 2026 — Not yet reported; December 2026 — Not yet reported. Percent of Ends Policy achievement. TARGET = 100% Table showing 2026 results by reporting period: February and April marked as not available; May reported at 100%. September and December results have not yet been reported. Percent of specific policy provisions that demonstrate compliance. TARGET = 100% Table showing 2026 results by reporting period: February reported at 100%; April marked as not available; May reported at 100%. September and December results have not yet been reported. Percent of specific policy provisions that demonstrate compliance. TARGET = 100% Table showing 2026 results by reporting period: February reported at 97.3%; April and May marked as not available. September and December results have not yet been reported. Percent of specific policy provisions that demonstrate compliance. TARGET = 100% Table showing 2026 results by reporting period: February, April, and May marked as not available . September and December results have not yet been reported. Percent of specific policy provisions that demonstrate compliance. TARGET = 100% Table showing 2026 results by reporting period: February reported at 100%; April and May marked as not available. September and December results have not yet been reported.
Critical Governance Process Outcomes









Public Interest Impact
This area of focus relates to the Board’s ability to clearly demonstrate attunement to the public interest in their decision making.
Percent of agenda items in Board meeting material which actually have a public interest rationale or specific questions related to the public interest / Percent of agenda items in Board meeting material which should have a public interest rationale or specific questions related to the public interest.
TARGET = 100%

Table showing 2026 results by reporting period: February reported at 72%, April at 100%, and May at 74%. September and December results have not yet been reported.
TARGET = 0%
Number of unresolved conflicts, number of conflicts declared / total number of motions at a Board meeting.

Table showing 2026 results by reporting period: February, April, and May each reported at 0%. September and December results have not yet been reported.